| 1. | Anurag Jain; Shoeb Siddiqui; Sujit Gujar: We might walk together, but I run faster: Network Fairness and Scalability in Blockchains. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2021), 2021. (Type: Conference | Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: Blockchains, Distributed Ledgers, fairness, Peer-to-Peer Networks, Scalability) @conference{Jain2021, title = {We might walk together, but I run faster: Network Fairness and Scalability in Blockchains}, author = {Anurag Jain and Shoeb Siddiqui and Sujit Gujar}, editor = {U. Endriss and A. Now\'{e} and F. Dignum and A. Lomuscio }, year = {2021}, date = {2021-05-05}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2021)}, abstract = {Blockchain-based Distributed Ledgers (DLs) promise to transform the existing financial system by making it truly democratic. In the past decade, blockchain technology has seen many novel applications ranging from the banking industry to real estate. However, in order to be adopted universally, blockchain systems must be scalable to support a high volume of transactions. As we increase the throughput of the DL system, the underlying peer-to-peer network might face multiple levels of challenges to keep up with the requirements. Due to varying network capacities, the slower nodes would be at a relative disadvantage compared to the faster ones, which could negatively impact their revenue. In order to quantify their relative advantage or disadvantage, we introduce two measures of network fairness, p_f, the probability of frontrunning and alpha_f, the publishing fairness. We show that as we scale the blockchain, both these measures deteriorate, implying that the slower nodes face a disadvantage at higher throughputs. It results in the faster nodes getting more than their fair share of the reward while the slower nodes (slow in terms of network quality) get less. Thus, fairness and scalability in blockchain systems do not go hand in hand. In a setting with rational miners, lack of fairness causes miners to deviate from the ``longest chain rule'' or emph{undercut}, which would reduce the blockchain's resilience against byzantine adversaries. Hence, fairness is not only a desirable property for a blockchain system but also essential for the security of the blockchain and any scalable blockchain protocol proposed must ensure fairness.}, keywords = {Blockchains, Distributed Ledgers, fairness, Peer-to-Peer Networks, Scalability}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {conference} } Blockchain-based Distributed Ledgers (DLs) promise to transform the existing financial system by making it truly democratic. In the past decade, blockchain technology has seen many novel applications ranging from the banking industry to real estate. However, in order to be adopted universally, blockchain systems must be scalable to support a high volume of transactions. As we increase the throughput of the DL system, the underlying peer-to-peer network might face multiple levels of challenges to keep up with the requirements. Due to varying network capacities, the slower nodes would be at a relative disadvantage compared to the faster ones, which could negatively impact their revenue. In order to quantify their relative advantage or disadvantage, we introduce two measures of network fairness, p_f, the probability of frontrunning and alpha_f, the publishing fairness. We show that as we scale the blockchain, both these measures deteriorate, implying that the slower nodes face a disadvantage at higher throughputs. It results in the faster nodes getting more than their fair share of the reward while the slower nodes (slow in terms of network quality) get less. Thus, fairness and scalability in blockchain systems do not go hand in hand. In a setting with rational miners, lack of fairness causes miners to deviate from the ``longest chain rule'' or emph{undercut}, which would reduce the blockchain's resilience against byzantine adversaries. Hence, fairness is not only a desirable property for a blockchain system but also essential for the security of the blockchain and any scalable blockchain protocol proposed must ensure fairness. |
| 2. | Shoeb Siddiqui; Sujit Gujar; Ganesh Vanahalli: BitcoinF: Achieving Fairness For Bitcoin In Transaction Fee Only Model. International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, AAMAS 2020, 2020. (Type: Conference | BibTeX | Tags: bitcoin, fairness) @conference{shoeb20a, title = {BitcoinF: Achieving Fairness For Bitcoin In Transaction Fee Only Model}, author = {Shoeb Siddiqui and Sujit Gujar and Ganesh Vanahalli}, year = {2020}, date = {2020-05-11}, booktitle = {International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, AAMAS 2020}, keywords = {bitcoin, fairness}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {conference} } |
| 1. | : We might walk together, but I run faster: Network Fairness and Scalability in Blockchains. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2021), 2021. |
| 2. | : BitcoinF: Achieving Fairness For Bitcoin In Transaction Fee Only Model. International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, AAMAS 2020, 2020. |